|
Post by brittanymartinat on Dec 8, 2010 11:55:06 GMT -5
I find this plan very interesting, but what bothers me is the timeline. Last year I learned, for this plan the analogy of fighting 2 guys in an alley. One is big and bulky and strong, but slower than molasses and the other is not quite so huge but much more quick. The idea is to kick but with the weaker one (France) and then turn and focus all of one’s strength on the big strong guy (Russia).This is much more effective than dividing one’s strength and trying to fight 2 at once. This is a well thought out plan based on the assumption that it would take Russia at least six weeks to fully mobilize their armies. And that, using the railroads the Germans could move their armies fast enough through Belgium to France, which they could crush the French and then turn to face Russia. However the timeline of this plan has always somewhat bothered me. As quick and well trained as Germany’s armies may be… I don’t know… Maybe my logic is messed, but it seems to me, to be a lot to accomplish in less than 6 weeks. I mean 6 weeks doesn’t seem like very much time to mobilize, Travel through Belgium, Defeat the French, Get back on the Railroads, Travel to the Eastern Front and prepare for battle with the Russians, all BEFORE the Russians can mobilize their army. They must've REALLY been cutting it close in terms of time.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Delainey on Dec 8, 2010 14:38:26 GMT -5
I think you're probably right, Brittany. The Germans were perhaps being a little optimistic; however, with that said we have to remember that a war the size of the "Great War" had never taken place; therefore, the Germans do not have a precedent that suggests the S. Plan cannot be successful. Also, the Russians really were ill-prepared.
In fact, many historians argue that had it not been for Belgium opening up its d**es/flood gates (thereby slowing the German advance) that France would have in fact been defeated. The Germans did not account for Belgian resistance. I think the S. Plan assumed a certain passivity on the part of the Belgians.
|
|